EVIDENCE HUB142 PUBLICATIONS

Evidence at a glance.

PUBLICATIONS 142 Peer-reviewed, 2019–2026
PATIENTS STUDIED 18.4k Across 64 sites in 12 countries
ACCURACY 0.5mm Mean deviation from plan (VEYRA-01)
RCTs 11 Including 2 multinational trials

Study library

8 OF 8 STUDIES
TYPE
PRODUCT
SPECIALTY
YEAR
RCTARC◆ HCP

Accuracy of robotic-assisted TKA

n412 · 9 sitesResult0.5 mm (95% CI 0.4–0.6) J ORTHOP ROBOT · 2025
REGISTRYARC

OR efficiency across 1,420 cases after ARC adoption

n1,420Result−18% OR time (p < 0.001) ST. AUREL REPORT · 2025
ECONOMICARC

Length of stay after robotic TKA: multicenter economic analysis

n2,960 · 14 sitesResult−0.8 days (95% CI −1.1 to −0.5) HEALTH ECON SURG · 2026
COHORTARC◆ HCP

Cup inclination accuracy in robotic THA

n286Result93% in safe zone vs. 71% HIP INT · 2026
VALIDATIONSIGHT

AI-guided image acquisition by non-expert users

n198Result91% diagnostic-quality images ULTRASOUND MED · 2026
RCTPULSE◆ HCP

AF detection with a 14-day wearable patch

n1,104ResultDetection 4.1× vs. 24-h Holter HEART RHYTHM J · 2025
COHORTARC

Two-year survivorship of robotic UKA

n344Result98.4% revision-free KNEE SURG J · 2024
META-ANALYSISARC◆ HCP

Robotic vs. manual TKA: meta-analysis

n1,390 · 5 RCTsResult+5.8 KSS (95% CI 3.9–7.7) ORTHOP REV · 2026

Pooled functional outcomes · KSS at 24 months

MEAN DIFFERENCE (95% CI)
Five studies favor ARC. Pooled +5.8 points (95% CI 3.9–7.7), I² = 18%, random effects. Axis −5 to +15. Illustrative.
LUMEN KIT